From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Apr 2 03:24:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4701552BFD for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 03:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C34D6F9FE for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 03:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0CA701552BF5; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 03:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA8A1552BF3 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 03:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB166F9FB; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 03:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:e8d0:f21e:9ff4:2888]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9267F2A2E; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 03:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:24:34 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: category for VPN softwares? Message-ID: <20190402032434.i5tvmzjrti6bz44s@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8FB166F9FB X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.93 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.930,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:96.47.64.0/20, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 03:24:42 -0000 Hi, some VPN softwares are in security category/directory. OTOH, some VPN softwares are in net category/directory. Which is correct & preferred? Incoherent categories are a little bit surprising and confusing for me. I'd like to sort out categories of VPN softwares. Probably we have following options. What do you think? I'd appreciate any comments or suggestions. 1. Incoherent categories are OK and leave it as-is 2. Move all VPN softwares to either of net or security 3. Create a new virtual category "vpn" and leave phys categories as-is 4. Create a new virtual category "vpn" and also sort out phys categories 5. Another option -- meta