Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 10:27:48 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools Makefile Message-ID: <20070520062748.GA54935@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070519105804.6b6cae10@kan.dnsalias.net> References: <200705190756.l4J7u9wP058382@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070519085103.GA61276@rambler-co.ru> <20070519105804.6b6cae10@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Sat, 19 May 2007 12:51:03 +0400 > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 07:56:09AM +0000, Scott Long wrote: > > > scottl 2007-05-19 07:56:09 UTC > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD src repository > > >=20 > > > Modified files: > > > gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools Makefile=20 > > > Log: > > > Work-around for upgrading from a pre-symbol-versioned world. > > > =20 > > > Blame-to: cperciva > > > =20 > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.86 +1 -0 src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile > > >=20 > > Can you elaborate as to what problem you're trying to address? > > I went through this process yesterday and hit no problems, all > > was smooth. >=20 > GCC build tools somehow were built against shared libc.so.7 with symbol > versioning, instead of library on host. So then when we attempted to > run them, they were failing. I do not know why it was happening on > amd64 machine Scott was trying upgrade on yet. My relatively old i386 > installation worked without a hitch :(=20 >=20 It sometimes happens when the date/time are not being set properly, so that the tools are mistakenly rebuilt again at an inappropriate time when in the foreign environment of the target -- the problem is usually understood better when building for another CPU architecture and hitting it. I think this was an inappropriate commit to make, unless the problem can be reproduced. I have upgraded several i386's and amd64's without a problem. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGT+pkqRfpzJluFF4RAvD7AJ4jzD99IsR0/gWmssfXgY/TqscEnACgicMI CkLqTpkkHVeAmrEjDt9b8Sk= =KbQN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070520062748.GA54935>