From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 12 20:30:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282A216A4CE for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:30:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from burrito.bitsurf.net (dcn235-229.dcn.davis.ca.us [168.150.235.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B896143D4C for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:30:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mharo@bitsurf.net) Received: from burrito.bitsurf.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by burrito.bitsurf.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3CKWGuo055226; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:32:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mharo@bitsurf.net) Received: (from mharo@localhost) by burrito.bitsurf.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j3CKWGAo055223; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:32:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mharo@bitsurf.net) X-Authentication-Warning: burrito.bitsurf.net: mharo set sender to mharo@bitsurf.net using -f Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:32:16 -0700 From: Michael Haro To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20050412203216.GA55168@bitsurf.net> References: <20050412064056.GA24914@bitsurf.net> <425C0F44.10407@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <425C0F44.10407@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p1 X-SMTP-From: localhost [127.0.0.1] (burrito.bitsurf.net) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 168.150.235.229 cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PVR-250 vs PVR-350? X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 20:30:18 -0000 On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:11:16AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Michael Haro wrote: > >I'm looking into building a mythtv box. I'm trying to decide between the > >PVR-250 and PVR-350. Does the FreeBSD cmx driver support any of the > >PVR-350 features? Is there any reason I should get the PVR-350 over the > >250? > > extra features of teh PVR350 over the PVR250 are not yet supported. Are there plans to support that stuff? Would it be useful for me to buy one to test the driver with? Michael