From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 12 23:55:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F051065693 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177678FC32 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r2bb217.net.upc.cz [62.245.117.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBCNtpHd021402; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:55:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Jonathan In-Reply-To: <4B210AA4.8070806@kc8onw.net> References: <4B1E4351.2030004@gmail.com> <20091208201711.GE3057@lonesome.com> <4B1EF4CC.9010004@quip.cz> <4B210AA4.8070806@kc8onw.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LxkKF99Y3X6HbIIqQE/+" Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:55:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1260662151.32588.18.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 62.245.117.217; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: linimon@lonesome.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pointyhat packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 23:55:57 -0000 --=-LxkKF99Y3X6HbIIqQE/+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jonathan p=ED=B9e v =E8t 10. 12. 2009 v 09:50 -0500: > On 12/8/2009 7:52 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > > What is the policy for package building nodes? I mean, is it possible t= o > > use some machines not owned directy by FreeBSD.org? > > For example, I have spare machine in our rack which I can lend for some > > period (until some production machine goes down and needs to be replace= d > > by this spare machine) or maybe I can set up some older unused machine > > (IBM x336). > > > > Is deploying of new node easy task or is it something special that is > > not useful to do for relatively short period of time? >=20 > I was wondering about this myself. I have a dual quad system that is=20 > almost completely idle most of the time and would love to see it used=20 > for something helpful to the project. I can guarantee access to it for=20 > at least a year if that helps. That would be a "remote node". It's possible, but it's not for everybody. First, it will generate an obscene amount of network traffic, both ways. Second, you need to fully surrender it and give us root on it. Also remote console access or at least power toggle would be good. Then Mark can borg it. :) --=20 Pav Lucistnik Eat when you are hungry, sleep when you are tired. Chase butterflies when you want some fun. --=-LxkKF99Y3X6HbIIqQE/+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkskLYYACgkQntdYP8FOsoI2+ACfdNes9g4+wSk9c33TYGTwPuqs GyIAoJF3tnFhsbmUeyaBxXrlNez+CIkO =o6aX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-LxkKF99Y3X6HbIIqQE/+--