Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:09:01 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: svn commit: r236917 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <20120613040900.GA88971@vniz.net> In-Reply-To: <20120613115111.R5323@besplex.bde.org> References: <201206112017.q5BKHKsW007722@svn.freebsd.org> <20120612114254.V1572@besplex.bde.org> <20120612115117.GB1372@garage.freebsd.pl> <20120613115111.R5323@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:37:50PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >>> - KASSERT(fd >= 0 && fd < fdp->fd_nfiles, > >>> + KASSERT((unsigned int)fd < fdp->fd_nfiles, > >>> ("file descriptor %d out of range (0, %d)", fd, fdp->fd_nfiles)); > >>> return ((fdp->fd_map[NDSLOT(fd)] & NDBIT(fd)) != 0); > >>> } > >> > >> This is backwards. Apart from using the worst possible (most verbose) > >> spelling of `unsigned', it uses a type hack manually optimize away the > >> test for fd being < 0. The compiler will do this "optimization" > >> automatically if it is any good (or undo it if it is not), so all the > >> hack does is obfuscate the test. With the verbose spelling of u_int, > >> it even takes more space. > > > > Well, to be honest I presonally would prefer explicit check for fd being > > less than 0, but my impression was that using cast is the most popular > > way and I wanted this check to be consistent across our source tree. > > > > Feel free to change it. > > I'm only free to ask you to back out it out. I agree that this change should backed out for better. It gains nothing for modern compilers, but makes code reading harder. -- http://ache.vniz.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120613040900.GA88971>