From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 2 11:10:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9FE106568B for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout5.freenet.de (mout5.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66368FC16 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.22] (helo=12.mx.freenet.de) by mout5.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.70 #1) id 1NFn6P-0006sl-1x for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:10:33 +0100 Received: from p57ae29b5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.174.41.181]:30242 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 12.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1NFn6O-00086t-Pz for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:10:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:10:32 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091202121032.0d9d294d@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20091201164448.0881b06a@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <20091128111501.34a7a2a4@ernst.jennejohn.org> <200912011009.59961.jhb@freebsd.org> <20091201164448.0881b06a@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: core dump in cvsup caused by _once()? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:10:34 -0000 On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:44:48 +0100 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > I'll give it a shot as soon as I can recompile the tree. Compiling libc > alone doesn't work right now - there's an error about a missing SIG_HOLD. > There's definitely a regression here. Even with an up-to-date src tree it's not possible to recompile libc on its own. The commit which added, among other things, the sighold handling seems to have broken things. --- Gary Jennejohn