From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org Fri Dec 2 14:09:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC91C62BA6; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126DA1C08; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 14:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-230-194.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.230.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uB2E8stk071764 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Dec 2016 06:08:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: why does java need /proc? To: Jung-uk Kim , freebsd-java@freebsd.org, freebsd References: <36b30691-2e1f-bec4-4960-b69826b1b1fc@freebsd.org> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <52af847e-bc96-e4fe-665b-a305792ba2d6@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 22:08:48 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:09:01 -0000 On 30/11/2016 5:50 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 11/29/2016 16:35, Julian Elischer wrote: >> DOes anyone know Why the port suggests mounting /proc? >> >> Seems to work fine without it. (so far) > It is not absolutely necessary any more. However, it is still used in > few places, e.g., Serviceability Agent. > > Jung-uk Kim > thanks