From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 10:50:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E894416A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:50:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59EE43D41 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i8RAo7aI073057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:50:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost)i8RAo7Nn073056; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:50:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost.klemm.apsfilter.org [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8RAjCRP006120; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:45:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8RAjCSp006119; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:45:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:45:12 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20040927104512.GA5976@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20040926214139.GA60201@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20040927061627.GA1384@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <200409271152.28294.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409271152.28294.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fatal error 'Spinlock called when not threaded.' ... (Re: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 available) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:50:13 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 11:52:24AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Perhaps you accidentally installed a package for 5.2.1-Release at some point > (qt is a likely candidate). Or you started out with 5.2.1-Release, upgraded > to your several 5.3-BETA stages and never actually recompiled your ports and > you have lots of linkage to libc_r left - if so, you should really do it soon > (you can check easily by ldd'ing stuff in /usr/local/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib - > if you have lots of stuff linking to libc_r, you're in for a portupgrade -fa. > Make sure to comment out all lines in /etc/libmap.conf before doing the > ldd-thing though: libmap will affect ldd as well and you'll get false results > if it's active. O.k. I understand. You'll certainly right on this ... Yes, I upgraded OS and ports not. So portupgrade -af is very likely. Without the entry in /etc/libmap.conf the re-compilation of all ports was not possible because of the described error during compilation. One final question. Do I need to comment out the entries in libmap.conf before doing the portupgrade -fa I fear without that mapping the portupgrade will fail. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/