From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Jun 29 12: 6:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.lewman.org (lowrider.lewman.org [209.67.240.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14EC37B9EF for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:06:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from deimos@lewman.com) Received: by mail.lewman.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 93C663D32; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:06:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lewman.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A135BBF for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:06:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 15:06:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Andy X-Sender: deimos@lowrider.lewman.org Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5 now available . . . . . In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I don't know what you're talking about "merging into future 4.x builds". > 4.x is already much more stable than 3.x ever was..the bug-fixing has > already taken place during the development of the 4.0 branch. Not to start a massive flamewar here, but in my personal experience with multiple FreeBSD boxes in a live environment, I've found that 3.x is much more stable than the 4.x servers. I've gone so far as to revert the 4.x server back to 3.x. I'm going to revisit the issue when it becomes 4.1. -- | Andy | e-mail | web | | | andy@lewman.com | www.lewman.com | You are the only person to ever get this message. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message