From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  9 16:41:08 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457CE16A5BD
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 May 2006 16:41:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com)
Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.195])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21E743D69
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 May 2006 16:41:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com)
Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so1462592nzi
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 09 May 2006 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=Al4R9qhmDNcgWZF1gbxdQZ2k7TED2RF2d+1c1ADv/wRIT/P5GqimCUa4m5OCJSwT26odGdfoZJRMJI1MjQJ7+Y+ZAwtBQMqlVjHiCQvNYasS7+MltTfSvfE1MuzbxaK4gheTeFNOuU1R4IN/f74uwdlwxJUyeRj2ZXjXISNmtR8=
Received: by 10.36.104.16 with SMTP id b16mr1658225nzc;
	Tue, 09 May 2006 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.14.22 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <747dc8f30605090941n2b133099pe0ba35ddd4ae646a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 13:41:06 -0300
From: "Renato Botelho" <rbgarga@gmail.com>
To: "Yuan, Jue" <yuanjue02@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200605100037.08447.yuanjue@yuanjue.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060508200926.GA6005@daemons.gr>
	<200605100037.08447.yuanjue@yuanjue.net>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports structure and improvement suggestions
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 16:41:09 -0000

On 5/9/06, Yuan, Jue <yuanjue02@gmail.com> wrote:
> Have got a question for the OPTIONS Framework.
>
> Since it will putting KNOBS in /etc/make.conf, the problem is:
> when one port put "WITH_X11=3Dyes" into make.conf, while later another
> port may put "WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes" into the same file. So when the ports
> tree are upgraded and building process for these two ports happens,
> as far as I can see, there are still some difficulties to tell which KNOB=
 is
> for which port, right?
>
> I am not saying it is unresolved. Many solutions I have seen are mentione=
d
> here. But it is not what the OPTIONS Framework does automatically ;-) So
> using the OPTIONS Framework only may not be a complete solution for ports=
,
> from this point of view :-)

Try solution proposed by flz@FreeBSD.org in this thread...

--
Renato Botelho