From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 17 12:10:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA10623
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 12:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA10614
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 17 May 1996 12:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA10080; Fri, 17 May 1996 13:08:44 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199605171908.NAA10080@rover.village.org>
To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Re(2): Standard Shipping Containers - A Proposal for Distributing FreeBSD 
Cc: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth), hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 17 May 1996 21:42:20 +0930
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 13:08:44 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: What could be simpler?  ctm is fine for people who want read-only
: source, and are willing to carry it all.  sup is much better for people
: who like to tinker with their tree.

Hmmm, with the CVS tree I can have a limited set of uncommitted
chanages and cvs update handles the merging.  Sup doesn't do this too
well...

Warner