From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jul 25 21:52:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA13998
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 21:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA13993
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 21:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA20697; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 21:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
cc: hosokawa@jp.freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pccard and -current; a long way to go. :-( 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Jul 1997 20:26:50 MDT."
             <199707260226.UAA27372@rocky.mt.sri.com> 
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 21:52:14 -0700
Message-ID: <20692.869892734@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > 2.2.2 bits gets me past the card recognition phase, there is still the
> > pccardd/ifconfig startup race which Nate claimed was not an issue.
> > Trust me - it's an issue! :-)
> 
> No it's not, you don't understand the startup code.  You're trying to
> use the 'stock' if_ed0 lines to configure thing, and it doesn't work
> that way.

But..  I've already argued that this shouldn't be necessary when
pccardd's ultimate aim is to make ed0 *exist* on my system; why in the
heck would I want to increase the number of places where this is done
from one to two?

					Jordan