From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 2 16:50:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFD937B400 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD5243E42 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:49:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g62NluUI092703; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:47:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g62NluLk092702; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:47:56 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Matthew Dillon Cc: FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: -current results (was something funny with soft updates?) Message-ID: <20020702164756.E70767@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Mail-Followup-To: David O'Brien , Matthew Dillon , FreeBSD current users References: <200207020314.g623Eke5038019@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200207020314.g623Eke5038019@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 08:14:46PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 08:14:46PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > My conclusion is that softupdates is working fine and (A) the new GCC > is a whole lot less efficient then the old GCC You really cannot say this -- GCC 3.1 does things 2.95 doesn't. 3.1 has a totally rewritten code scheduler. People can't get Pentium-4 and Athlon tbird specific optimizations for free. You almost seem to be making a claim on the quality of generated code, vs. just the run-time of the compiler. The two are different. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message