From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Feb 25 13:25:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [207.153.65.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACA614E06 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 13:24:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA00264 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 1999 16:24:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 16:24:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: IO port access under DOSCMD Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to use DOSCMD to snoop the 'under the hood operation' of some diagnostic utils that muck about with a network card. I'm getting some fairly useless results that lead me to believe that DOSCMD isn't allowing access to the ports in question. (For if it were I would expect the utils to find the cards.) Granted that allowing something to muck about with the IO port space could cause bad things to happen on the test box, I still want to be able to give access to the ports in question. Anyone have any ideas? 'doscmd -P' appears to be invocation to use to enable tracing of all port operations, and I've adjusted MAXPORT in doscmd.h to allow access to ports in the EISA IO address range but nothing works. Thanks. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | 78 280Z | 75 164E | 84 245DL | FreeBSD/NetBSD/Sprite/VMS | | winter@jurai.net | This Space For Rent | ix86,sparc,m68k,pmax,vax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | Are you k-rad elite enough for my webpage? | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message