From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  7 10:28:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A39CF88
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 10:28:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net
 [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BD1889
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 10:28:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 81977 invoked by uid 80); 7 Apr 2014 10:28:01 -0000
Received: from 217.110.62.221 ([217.110.62.221]) by
 avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 07 Apr 2014
 12:28:01 +0200
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:28:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20140407122801.Horde.5xq2r-rKMOXKBCqbSukjFQ5@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
From: Oliver Lehmann <oliver@freebsd.org>
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: r263478 - /stable/10/sys/net/route.h breaks net-snmp
References: <20140406101131.Horde.OoOkpfQUTkPO6Q0jKJFQvw7@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
 <20140407092611.GP44326@glebius.int.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20140407092611.GP44326@glebius.int.ru>
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.7)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: zi@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 10:28:12 -0000

Hi Gleb,

> Strange. This is how it builds on my CURRENT:
>
> checking for struct rtentry.rt_dst... no
> checking for struct rtentry.rt_hash... no
> checking for struct rtentry.rt_next... no
> checking for struct rtentry.rt_refcnt... no
> checking for struct rtentry.rt_unit... no
> checking for struct rtentry.rt_use... no
> checking type of rtentry structure... unknown
> checking for struct rtentry... rtentry
>
> After that, it compiles fine.
>
> In your log it detects 'struct ortentry' and surprisingly prefers it.

Please check 10-STABLE.
- ortentry is visible
- rtentry is not visible
I guess this is the reason why. I didn't checked CURRENT, just grabbed
up the log via google (I have no CURRENT system atm). My issue is on
STABLE where you merged this to. I wonder why this API-breakage got
merged anyway?!