Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:28:01 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann <oliver@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: zi@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: r263478 - /stable/10/sys/net/route.h breaks net-snmp Message-ID: <20140407122801.Horde.5xq2r-rKMOXKBCqbSukjFQ5@avocado.salatschuessel.net> In-Reply-To: <20140407092611.GP44326@glebius.int.ru> References: <20140406101131.Horde.OoOkpfQUTkPO6Q0jKJFQvw7@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <20140407092611.GP44326@glebius.int.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Gleb, > Strange. This is how it builds on my CURRENT: > > checking for struct rtentry.rt_dst... no > checking for struct rtentry.rt_hash... no > checking for struct rtentry.rt_next... no > checking for struct rtentry.rt_refcnt... no > checking for struct rtentry.rt_unit... no > checking for struct rtentry.rt_use... no > checking type of rtentry structure... unknown > checking for struct rtentry... rtentry > > After that, it compiles fine. > > In your log it detects 'struct ortentry' and surprisingly prefers it. Please check 10-STABLE. - ortentry is visible - rtentry is not visible I guess this is the reason why. I didn't checked CURRENT, just grabbed up the log via google (I have no CURRENT system atm). My issue is on STABLE where you merged this to. I wonder why this API-breakage got merged anyway?!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140407122801.Horde.5xq2r-rKMOXKBCqbSukjFQ5>