From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 20 20:54:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA16602 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 20:54:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA16509; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 20:53:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.50]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with ESMTP id AAA16782; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 22:56:04 +0500 Message-ID: <3605CD09.C8681327@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 22:50:33 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More on the Intel-UNIX standard References: <199809210326.UAA02832@word.smith.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG OK, I also believe this belongs in advocacy...JIC someone doesn't understand http://www.sco.com/udi/ We need a big group of users explaining why FreeBSD would be a good platform to target the new device standard, and why they should use a BSD license. Pedro. /* end of discussion in -hackers */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message