From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Jun 26 22:56:50 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from swan.en-bio.com.au (swan.en-bio.com.au [203.35.254.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8A52914EE0; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from Tony.Maher@eBioInformatics.com)
Received: from office.internal.en-bio (www-cache.en-bio.com.au [203.35.254.2])
	by swan.en-bio.com.au (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA15203;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:56:45 +1000
Received: (from tonym@localhost)
	by office.internal.en-bio (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id PAA30700;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:56:14 +1000
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:56:14 +1000
From: Tony Maher <Tony.Maher@eBioInformatics.com>
Message-Id: <199906270556.PAA30700@office.internal.en-bio>
To: cpiazza@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/6699: New port: the Generic NQS system
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Synopsis: New port: the Generic NQS system
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: cpiazza
> State-Changed-When: Sat Jun 26 20:27:16 PDT 1999
> State-Changed-Why: 
> New port committed, thanks!
> On behalf of the ports team I'd like to apologize for the length
> of time it took to commit this port.

Thanks!  Actually its been so long another version has come out ;-)
I have an updated port of this new version. I will try to send a PR
asap but work commitents mean little time for it.
Which is more appropriate? Diffs to the original port or a complete "port"?

tonym


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message