From owner-freebsd-security Sun Nov 14 20:40:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D1114C01; Sun, 14 Nov 1999 20:40:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA04463; Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:40:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:40:30 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199911150440.XAA04463@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - work around ?? In-Reply-To: References: <4.1.19991114225545.04626d60@granite.sentex.ca> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > Yes, but it would also be against the patents of our wonderful RSA. You missed an important point: >> Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike >> Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400 So Mike is located in Canada, and thus the patent may not apply to him (at least not the US patent). A better question is: why does Mike want people to make operator-assisted calls to Peru when trying to reach him? -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message