Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 17:50:07 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: change in ports rc.d script behaviour Message-ID: <200407251750.11570.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040724193515.GA4208@speedy.unibe.ch> References: <20040724150905.GA998@rogue.acs-et.com> <4102B1BF.4040106@FreeBSD.org> <20040724193515.GA4208@speedy.unibe.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_za9ABDO3tZ5tMAb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 24 July 2004 21:35, Tobias Roth wrote: > and it's not mikes responsibility to fix every port this breaks. I fail to see why src committers need not take responsibility for breaking= =20 ports and help fixing them, especially if they're told beforehand during=20 review that their changes will break ports. Mtm seems to have pretty specific ideas about how to fix them, too, so it=20 shouldn't take him much time at all to send-pr some diffs so the respective= =20 port-maintainers can review and approve them. Ideally, those PRs should hav= e=20 been sent, reviewed and committed to ports _before_ committing to src, but= =20 it's obviously too late for that now. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_za9ABDO3tZ5tMAb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBA9azXhc68WspdLARAgNrAJwK/kt7CeUKMlpyQKfpRYHrSqQY6wCfUVEb qLeTiPX1xAJ/B4vO8d5qulA= =E/mA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_za9ABDO3tZ5tMAb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407251750.11570.michaelnottebrock>