From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 17:34:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470063C0 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nonesuch@longcount.org) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87358FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fw7so5292220vcb.13 for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:34:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to :message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :x-gm-message-state; bh=zxVgSQFZqRq5b30c+W0Z4G7+5uiSNMvQ9hU6J9odu0E=; b=TifjXlxLRbGlylcNiGXC28B4NLEuSE+lhkHYEOqLzIRvEGJ31RWf2U/oAhXvhePU0s 4kGcukprXSDtg17yWcUCJClDvjLbl9iUu/DIyFJnCKdFSECf9ZysBLH1+m9TRqK2SKw6 FIGxiCiz3V5BYbV37Lan7FIGYScdLMFG/PRsMo9OpxVVgz3cHtuMx64kGz53ZWrz09WB et2hZqEGxpiUtMG1NKCOsDpf0S1xP2Snlx29cGo0PXkh2fzZRaIEcso6JSBFqSJ6P3wG 98D4k8CT2x5asVOrx7her5XXpiSVzPlIb+ZSVBJ4uOvtPbrLBIbvJYgp4cl+qx94KP1E Xb6Q== Received: by 10.220.115.138 with SMTP id i10mr2495360vcq.37.1351877664033; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:34:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.11.202] (ool-182c8567.dyn.optonline.net. [24.44.133.103]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f10sm5848289vdk.5.2012.11.02.10.34.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? References: <201211020214.UAA29489@lariat.net> <20121102091021.23cf9af0@suse3> From: Mark Saad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: <20121102091021.23cf9af0@suse3> Message-Id: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:34:20 -0400 To: "stable@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZrNyCXLdultz4uAmVhWx+Pr4/Cn9LkcSZuoe4cTbqfU67lk5gYww91H+KfgIqjAZ+TmfL X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:34:25 -0000 On Nov 2, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT) > schrieb Brett Glass : >=20 >> I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how >> FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and >> robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait >> until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome. >=20 >=20 > If I'm not mistaken, the bge-stuff that makes the default NICs ins HP > G8 servers (360+380) actually run will not make it back into 9.1. > Intel cards work much better anyway... >=20 Did you swap out the bge nic daughter card in the g8 servers for an intel on= e or , do you mean in general the intel nic support is better ?=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"