From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 27 1:27: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (beachchick.freebsd.dk [212.242.34.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F41737B43F for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 01:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e7R8QpN01331; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 10:26:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: chris@calldei.com Cc: Boris Popov , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: official devfs patch for review In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 26 Aug 2000 20:08:44 CDT." <20000826200844.N60058@holly.calldei.com> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 10:26:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1329.967364811@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000826200844.N60058@holly.calldei.com>, Chris Costello writes: >On Sunday, August 27, 2000, Boris Popov wrote: >> No, not all bits are incorporated. At least you've missed two >> important things. First: >> >> # cd /dev/fd >> # ls >> 0 1 2 >> # cd .. >> # ls >> 0 1 2 >> >> And second - directory names supplied by readdir() function >> contains junk characters at the end. > > I'm going to commit some fdescfs-related patches sometime soon >next week. If you're not using the fdescfs code already, I can >probably integrate my work into devfs, since that was the point >of my work on fdescfs. I'm not quite ready to embrace fdescfs yet, I want to get devfs fully debugged first. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message