From owner-freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Sun Mar 25 23:36:53 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B73F52B09 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5667FA75 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3CB82F52B02; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: apache@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A81DF52AFC for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD51B7FA6E for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 134851623B for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w2PNaoKM034649 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w2PNaoom034648 for apache@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 225499] www/apache24: child pid exit signal Segmentation fault Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: greenreaper@hotmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Not A Bug X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: apache@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 23:36:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225499 Laurence 'GreenReaper' Parry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greenreaper@hotmail.com --- Comment #14 from Laurence 'GreenReaper' Parry = --- For what it's worth, I ran into this after a rebuild, and found that settin= g: [opcache] opcache.optimization_level=3D0x2ef resolved the issue for me on a MediaWiki and Drupal installation (FreeBSD 10.4). This removes passes 5 and 9 which perform block optimization and register allocation, while leaving other optimizations intact. If this doesn't work = for you you could try setting it to 0 and then flipping bits like I did. Obviously, this is not ideal, but as others have noted, 5.6 is kind of on l= ife support and the best solution is likely to be an orderly migration to 7.x (ideally 7.1 or above) which will require testing of your application as th= ere are likely to be some issues. On the plus side, the performance gain is incredible. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=