From owner-cvs-all  Wed Jun 23 10: 7:53 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9A6A614F60; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 10:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp)
Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:WUMz8EFlopp4TP/wcWweFYtttYYYikU5@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1])
	by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7Wpl2) with ESMTP id CAA02871;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:03:19 +0900 (JST)
Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP
	id CAA00301; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:07:29 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199906231707.CAA00301@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>
To: sos@freebsd.dk, tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de (Thomas Gellekum),
	cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Cc: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 cons.c cons.h src/sys/i386/isa vesa.c
	 src/sys/i386/include console.h src/sys/alpha/al 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:11:10 JST."
             <199906231311.WAA05127@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> 
References: <199906231156.NAA62202@freebsd.dk>  <199906231311.WAA05127@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> 
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 02:07:29 +0900
From: Kazutaka YOKOTA <yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


>>> >   Log:
>>> >   The second phase of syscons reorganization.
>>> 
>>> Do you plan to merge these changes into RELENG_3 at some point in the
>>> not too distant future?
>>
>>Erhm, I'd say no, there is too much difference between -stable and -current
>>here, besides -stable gets bugfixes, not new funtionality/design by definitio
>n
>
>JFYI.  Difference between -CURRENT and -STABLE is not the issue here.
>Necessary amount of effort to back-port these update to -STABLE is
>negligible.
>
>The most significant difference between -CURRENT and -STABLE is
>new-bus stuff.  But, it won't affect these drivers much.  In fact, I
>prepared much of this update before new-bus got into -CURRENT when
>-CURRENT and -STABLE were still very similar.
>
>Anyway, if we strictly stick to the principle that -STABLE only gets
>fixes and no enhancement, this update won't be merged to -STABLE.
>
>But, we find it fixes some problems in -STABLE (I don't know if there

     Oops, I meant "But, if we find that it fixes some problems..."
                         ~~

>is any, though), we might contemplate MFC.
>
>Kazu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message