From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 11 19:23:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from newman2.bestweb.net (newman2.bestweb.net [209.94.102.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C7637B4EE; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from okeeffe.bestweb.net (okeefe.bestweb.net [209.94.100.110]) by newman2.bestweb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91E62331C; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:17:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by okeeffe.bestweb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id CA3959EFEF; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:12:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 02:30:21 +0600 From: Max Khon To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: obrien@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about gcj? (Re: Not committing WARNS settings...) Message-Id: <20020212021216.CA3959EFEF@okeeffe.bestweb.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, there! On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:52:40PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > But alright, let's say -- ports. gcj and gcjh themselves are > installed by the several lang/gcc* ports, but they are not functional > (libgcj/libjava are not ported). As a ports committer I might try to fix > that, but I think, those ports should complement the base system, and > that the base system should provide the bits it already uses itself > (like libbfd and libiberty) to the programmers, that use FreeBSD -- > install them into /usr/lib and link them _dynamicly_ into the tools. dynamically linked libiberty would be a nightmare. libbfd anf libiberty do not have version numbers, are not maintained (i.e. there is no official releases). every project includes its own libiberty and imho an attempt to find least common denominator will fail /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message