From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 20:47:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD15650 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out8.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out8.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C506F786 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:47:08 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtEFAOhHrFRyxkj4/2dsb2JhbABcgwZSWII2T8M2hXsCgQ4WAQEBAQF9hA0BBAEIGwU3JwMCBgMNAgQHAiYCAhk+AQEEEwuIGQeudJQdgSGOXhaCUoFBBYxMgVmDQYtYizwigUUMgjEqMQGCQgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,710,1413216000"; d="scan'208";a="887599329" Received: from unknown (HELO ianfPC) ([114.198.72.248]) by icp-osb-irony-out8.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2015 04:43:58 +0800 From: "commerce ttgraphic" To: References: <001601d02930$4c56f280$e504d780$@com.au> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: FreeBSD 10.1 on Proliant ML150 G6 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 07:43:42 +1100 Message-ID: <001501d029f1$753e2ad0$5fba8070$@com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdApMgCqxTfC64tHQHK1xtcVFUChwQAvQhMw Content-Language: en-au X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 20:47:09 -0000 >> Am 05.01.2015 um 22:41 schrieb Ian Fitzgerald : >>=20 >> Initially posted to fbsd-questions >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Hello recipients >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> I have performed countless installs over many years and most have = been=20 >> easy, or my errors are soon discovered. >>=20 >Interesting. > >So it=E2=80=99s a native em(4)-card now, not one OEM=E2=80=99ed by HP? > >Does it work with CentOS6/7Ubuntu12/14 as desired? > > > > >Rainer The embedded HP OEM'd 'card' was the bge, and em is the PCIe card = inserted by me to test against after finding problem with bge. My understanding is that drivers for each exist in the GENERIC kernel, = as suggested by the results of=20 hardware probe. I chose the Intel Gigabit CT card as it is commonly = used. I have not tested it against CentOS6/7Ubuntu12/14. Ping works when sent to the machine's own address, in this case = 192.168.1.71, but not when sent to other hosts. Other machines on The 192.168.1.xxx network are unable to get a response when I ping = 192.168.1.71 IanF.