From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 16:00:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E7116A46D for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F19013C489 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2007 16:00:18 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 18:00:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19bAFAUGahbaCYNUPnc/CqP4t5DqxGPKG56LvjnTs YaoKcAZPXAcIoM Message-ID: <4677FD8F.1020803@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:00:15 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070616) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tradigan@newrevolutions.net References: <50297.208.40.168.12.1182268291.squirrel@www.newrevolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <50297.208.40.168.12.1182268291.squirrel@www.newrevolutions.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:00:21 -0000 tradigan@newrevolutions.net wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just started using portsnap and I must say that I like it.. With > that said, I am noticing something here that maybe a configuration issue > on my end, but here is the deal: > > I have a newly installed 6.2 box, and I ran portsnap fetch followed by > portsnap extract.. This updated the ports tree just fine.. > > Now, I know that /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade was moved to > /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade. This is visible when you use CVSup to > update the ports tree (ie: /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade does not > exist). However with portsnap, the /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade > directory still exists. Is there a way to get portsnap to remove ports > that were removed and/or moved? Actually it does that, but only if the files have been created by it. I think the manual states that you should 'rm -rf /usr/ports' before using portsnap for the first time.