Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:05:30 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20 is being merged Message-ID: <20071026230530.GA57346@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1193419761.21743.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <1193261223.93212.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <op.t0rsgwav9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20071026155223.GB7312@FreeBSD.org> <1193419761.21743.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:29:21PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev p??e v p? 26. 10. 2007 v 15:52 +0000: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:27:58PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > > Before anyone ask about why not test in pointyhat first. We did, but > > > pointyhat has stability problems so it has missed some ports. We had to go > > > ahead put in FreeBSD ports tree and we will be working on from there and > > > we also will be keeping our eyes on pointyhat logs. > > > > I'm worried about PF date coming too soon. Maybe we should extend it > > (say, for a week) so Gnome-related problems can get fixed before the > > deadline? > > And what is the freeze designed for other than fixing port problems? I believe I've seen PF date extended in the past for exactly the same reason. If I'm mistaken, please accept my apologies, and let's move on! ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071026230530.GA57346>