From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 12 20:56:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E25C106566B for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:56:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D438C8FC43 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets ([91.190.8.131]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id n7CKuHmd032595 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:56:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <4A832C70.4030600@fgznet.ch> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:56:16 +0200 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Subject: tools/kerneldoc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:56:20 -0000 Hi, does anybody care about this 'kerneldoc' package? Robert's call for testers made me browse through this tools directory and as a newbie I wanted to start with something easy. But I horribly fail to build the docs. %deuterium_fbsd# make %make: don't know how to make device_if.m. Stop I then dived into the subsys dir and started a 'make all'. Here too, I failed since a few .m files are no more or they are placed on a different place. Well, this was easy, more or less. Commenting them made the build work, but this is only half the truth, what about the new .m files? I launched a 'find . -name "*.m" | sort | sed s_\./_MFILES+=_' in the /usr/src/sys dir and adjusted the Makefile in subsys. Still building... but it is building! So, my simple question, is this kerneldoc something we want to have maintained? Or is it an artifact from earlier times? TIA, Andreas