From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 26 17:34:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84AC4AB4; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (smtp1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA81FB5; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 0780B20E7088C; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.1.68] (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.141.170]) by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC21020E70886; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <544D313E.8090908@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:37:02 +0000 From: Steven Hartland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guido Falsi , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: detach with active requests on 10.1-RC3 References: <544A538F.6060202@FreeBSD.org> <544BBB85.2020909@madpilot.net> <544BC990.4030700@madpilot.net> <544CC4D4.7040203@FreeBSD.org> <544D137A.7010006@multiplay.co.uk> <544D3038.7080901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <544D3038.7080901@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:34:52 -0000 On 26/10/2014 17:32, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 10/26/14 16:30, Steven Hartland wrote: >> >>> I bisected commits and finally found out this happens starting with >>> r268815, which MFCed r268205. >>> >>> It is related to trim support, in fact disabling trim on the filesystm >>> "fixes" it. >>> >>> I filed bug #194606 on bugzilla [1] to further track this issue, if >>> anyone is interested. >>> >>> [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194606 >> Nice work Guido, can you try the attached patch and see if that fixes it >> please? > It dies the same way with this patch applied. I tested applying the > patch both in stable/10 at r268815 and to a fresh releng/10.1. > Looks like our mails might have cross over, was this with the original patch or the updated one?