Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Oct 2020 12:26:12 +0200
From:      Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Emmanuel Vadot <manu@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r551167 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg
Message-ID:  <20201002122612.6dc4c1e7853435506790a197@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201002100029.GA22826@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202010020901.09291fXL073017@repo.freebsd.org> <20201002100029.GA22826@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:00:29 +0000
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 09:01:41AM +0000, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > New Revision: 551167
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/551167
> > 
> > Log:
> >   ports-mgmt/pkg: Update to 1.15.7
> >   
> >   Changes from 1.15.6 to 1.15.7:
> >    - Fix %# expand in script
> 
> Guys (pkg maintainers),
> 
> Does every little bugfix really warrant another pkg version release?

 Yes.

> It's getting a bit annoying.

 Fixing bugs ? yes I agree but eh.

>  Can't those changes be kept as patches
> until enough other changes to pkg would really require a new version?

 No.
 I don't see why it would be better, in fact it would be worse as more
work (just the little annoyance work of removing the patches in files/)
would be needed.
 And as bapt said, you would recompile pkg anyway.

> ./danfe


-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20201002122612.6dc4c1e7853435506790a197>