From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec  6  2:40:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F330537B405
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  6 Dec 2001 02:40:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fB6AeJa54328;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 03:40:19 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB6AeIM89764;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 03:40:19 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200112061040.fB6AeIM89764@harmony.village.org>
To: "Stephen Hulten" <sgerardh@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: DRIVER_MODULE macro devclass_t argument used? 
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, sgh@silvannetworks.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2001 01:51:21 PST."
		<NCBBLOLLILBEBEEFIGDAKEANDAAA.sgerardh@earthlink.net> 
References: <NCBBLOLLILBEBEEFIGDAKEANDAAA.sgerardh@earthlink.net>  
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 03:40:18 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <NCBBLOLLILBEBEEFIGDAKEANDAAA.sgerardh@earthlink.net> "Stephen Hulten" writes:
: My question is whether the static devclass_t structure is really ever
: used.

Yes, it is used.  It is where the devclass numbering comes from.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message