From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 2 12:52:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8FD16A46B; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160E113C448; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17872082; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:52:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0502089; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:52:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 73101844A4; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:52:18 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: "Vlad GALU" References: <001f01c80407$1358d490$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <00ab01c8040c$7c408160$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <012101c804e5$efa7e9c0$b6db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <86abr1yb68.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86641pyanc.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86wsu5wuz3.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:52:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Vlad GALU's message of "Tue\, 2 Oct 2007 15\:41\:39 +0300") Message-ID: <86sl4twuf1.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, gepu@flow.rdsnet.ro Subject: Re: How to enable more than 256 pty's? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:52:27 -0000 "Vlad GALU" writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > "Vlad GALU" writes: > > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so > > > he can catch up with the thread. > > Which symptoms? I can no longer reproduce the hang-on-close bug. > Strangely enough, me neither. In his case, allocated pts' wouldn't get > deallocated once the sessions ended. Wouldn't get deallocated right away, or wouldn't get deallocated at all? Apparently, it is not unusual for pts reclamation to be delayed a bit by a non-zero refcnt. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no