From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org  Mon Aug  8 18:41:10 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196ADBB3035;
 Mon,  8 Aug 2016 18:41:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net",
 Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB78D1A26;
 Mon,  8 Aug 2016 18:41:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22])
 by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 903A6646;
 Mon,  8 Aug 2016 13:41:08 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:41:07 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>
Cc: "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>,
 sparc64@freebsd.org, Anna Wilcox <AWilcox@wilcox-tech.com>,
 freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>,
 Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>,
 Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>,
 Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com>
Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about
 Sparc64
Message-ID: <20160808184107.GB15252@lonesome.com>
References: <64302b19-9f33-4267-af44-7fc30ea4bf3d@email.android.com>
 <56434F34.6040707@sorbs.net>
 <CAJ-VmonAhoch8XR+JdM+br5jxvngQdithtgaDAJ4XmgEahreYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160805153236.GA16908@funkthat.com>
 <CAHM0Q_O37LCou868bk0_LL38V4hbpAzYuO30QL6-hCAq0Lw36A@mail.gmail.com>
 <608A3403-D15D-4092-B097-15B30F600B97@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <608A3403-D15D-4092-B097-15B30F600B97@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:44:19 +0000
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 18:41:10 -0000

On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:44:07AM -0700, Devin Teske wrote:
> Is there a "latest version" that this hardware won't run? Admitting
> here to not being up-to-date on this [particularly long-lived] thread.

10.1 runs fine (and thus probably 10.x).  I haven't generated an 11 image yet.

mcl