From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 24 10:11:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E122716A418 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from obh.snafu.de (v6.gruft.de [IPv6:2001:1560:2342::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC3113C4A5 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from ob by obh.snafu.de with local (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IkdCg-000Oc3-JB for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:11:10 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:11:10 +0200 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071024101110.GC55032@e-Gitt.NET> References: <471F0422.5080800@interazioni.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jt0yj30bxbg11sci" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <471F0422.5080800@interazioni.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: Advanced routing option X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:11:17 -0000 --jt0yj30bxbg11sci Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:36:50AM +0200, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > I'm using FreeBSD and Monowall in the most of my servers. >=20 > One limit I'm facing on both is the lack of an advanced routing feature. >=20 > Would be too complicated to modify "route" sources (and probably kernel= =20 > tables) implementing a FROM parameter in ADD command? >=20 > route add 0.0.0.0/0 210.10.10.1 > route add FROM 200.1.1.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 210.10.10.10 > route add FROM 200.1.2.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 210.10.11.11 >=20 > A FROM option would improve a lot routing capabilities and handling of=20 > multiple WAN connections. >=20 > Any comment? It's quite easy and very flexible to use for example pf for that. This=20 is actually a lot more flexible than doing that in routing tables. I see=20 no reason to blow up the efficient and well working routing framework=20 for an edge case which can be handled easily by existing tools. - Oliver --=20 | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | --jt0yj30bxbg11sci Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHHxo+iqtMdzjafykRAo5TAKCrCWn5rY48X1soRbEeOIX+8OkUNACePWAo lS7Uo+HXRApt8JNVvrhV1w0= =s7oc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jt0yj30bxbg11sci--