From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 7 13:33:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from aslan.scsiguy.com (aslan.scsiguy.com [63.229.232.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1831B37B417; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:33:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from scsiguy.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aslan.scsiguy.com (8.11.6/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g27LZHI62739; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:35:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from gibbs@scsiguy.com) Message-Id: <200203072135.g27LZHI62739@aslan.scsiguy.com> To: Julian Elischer Cc: Matthew Dillon , John Baldwin , Bruce Evans , Terry Lambert , Alfred Perlstein , Bosko Milekic , Seigo Tanimura , FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() & interrupt assem In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Mar 2002 12:45:36 PST." Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 14:35:17 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > >On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >> >> The only way it will get delayed that long is if you spend all of your >> time stomping up and down, writing in all caps, and tell the rest of >> us that we have to follow the proceedures you think are appropriate. >> That's not how colaboration works. You need to compromise and not get >> all pissed off if the process requires you to delay your commit for a >> bit. > >Justin, the stuff was backed out when requested, and has been so for >quite a while now. Sure. That doesn't excuse the fact that it was committed in the first place. >NOT ONE SINGLE of the dog-in-the-manger people has bothered to review it >in that week. How long is he expected to wait? So, after screaming obsenities at John and creating a big stink on our lists, you want to know why those in the know haven't felt like engaging Matt? I'm not saying that is an excuse, just a possible reason. I've already asked John to move this stuff along in my other mail, so don't try to pin me up as an obstructionist. >He's been sitting around for a week waiting for a single person to want >to discuss it. Hey, if Matt wants to believe that he can only be productive once his changes are committed, that is his problem. >> It is only a huge deal because it was made into a huge deal. If the >> change had been discussed prior to being pushed into the tree, this >> would never have happened. I don't think that John, or anyone else, is >> opposed to the change going in once some small issues are discussed first. >> Just get over this "I've been abused" bit already and discuss the changes! >> We all want to move on and I'd rather see us moving on with your changes >> than without. > >No it's only a huge deal because OTHERS made it a huge deal. So we're supposed to ignore it when Matt breaks the rules just because he is such a good hacker? Been there. Tried that. Now where here again. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message