From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Nov 2 18:13:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CBD37B401 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from subliminal.tekrealm.net (subliminal.tekrealm.net [64.81.247.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0126C43E6E for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:13:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from elitetek@tekrealm.net) Received: from subliminal.tekrealm.net (whoami@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by subliminal.tekrealm.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gA32Dh1L069370; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:13:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from elitetek@tekrealm.net) Received: (from elitetek@localhost) by subliminal.tekrealm.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gA32COmQ069329; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:12:24 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: subliminal.tekrealm.net: elitetek set sender to elitetek@tekrealm.net using -f Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:12:24 -0800 From: Andrew Stuart To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 patch ( Was: ipv6 breakage or me? ) Message-ID: <20021103021224.GB69276@freebsd.tekrealm.net> Reply-To: elitetek@tekrealm.net References: <20021102202238.GA66480@freebsd.tekrealm.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks, I actually caught this already. The problem turned out to be a change made in the kernel by the other admin. I need to convince my boss that there should be only one root admin. Thanks for the advice though, I was up'ing the interface through another method, i will use this patch as it is cleaner. On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 at 06:54:00 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:22:38 -0800 > >>>>> Andrew Stuart said: > > elitetek> The patch you were talking about, was that ever applied? > > elitetek> I have been fighting with 2 boxes that after going to 4.7 lost ipv6 > elitetek> support, i am using the freenet6 client, tspc, it seems to connect > elitetek> and do everything its suppost to, but commands like ping6 dont seem > elitetek> to get out. I am not sure if this is related to what you guys were > elitetek> talking about.. anyways both boxes have been rebuilt oct-13 or later.. > > The behavior that gif was mistakenly up by tunnel creation > (SIOCSIFPHYADDR) was fixed in 4.7-RELEASE. So, you need to do up gif > interface explicitly. freebsd44.sh of tscp doesn't do this. Please > try following patch: > > Index: freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh > diff -u freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh.orig freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh > --- freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh.orig Sun Nov 3 06:31:28 2002 > +++ freenet6-0.9.6/template/freebsd44.sh Sun Nov 3 06:31:50 2002 > @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ > fi > Exec $ifconfig $TSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE create > Exec $gifconfig $TSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE $TSP_CLIENT_ADDRESS_IPV4 $TSP_SERVER_ADDRESS_IPV4 > + Exec $ifconfig $TSP_TUNNEL_INTERFACE up > > # > # Configured tunnel config (IPv6) > > freebsd44.sh seems to assing address. So, essentially, it should be > okay wishout above patch. However, unfortunately, gif has one more > problem that it doesn't up by address assign (SIOCSIFADDR). This > problem was fixed in 5-CURRENT, and it will be MFC'ed. > > Sincerely, > > -- > Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan > ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org > http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Andrew Stuart http://www.tekrealm.net The makers may make and the users may use, but the fixers must fix with but minimal clues To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message