From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jun 12 12:19:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA24659 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 12:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from twwells.com (twwells.com [199.79.159.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA24651 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 12:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by twwells.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #8) id m0uTvRs-00018aC; Wed, 12 Jun 96 15:19 EDT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) Subject: Re: news server Date: 12 Jun 1996 15:19:20 -0400 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4pn57o$dq5@twwells.com> References: <19282.834601932@palmer.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.twwells.com Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article <19282.834601932@palmer.demon.co.uk>, Gary Palmer wrote: : cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.com : : Stephen Hovey wrote in message ID : : : > That sounds the same as what happens with MMAP : : Surprising. shared_active uses MMAP :-) How do you thing it does it's : sharing? The usual problem with mmap on other systems, as I understand it, is that the modify time of the file isn't updated on write, which meant that newsreaders wouldn't know that it has changed. This would not affect sharing among newsreaders....