From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 08:43:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120F937B401 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 08:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523D843F93 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 08:43:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h49Fh5m2062308 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 08:43:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h49Fh4e1062307 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Fri, 9 May 2003 08:43:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 08:43:04 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030509154304.GC61844@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200305081617.h48GHcZT008633@arch20m.dellroad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Subject: Re: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 15:43:12 -0000 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 01:20:28PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > At any rate, can we please put this thread to rest until > Jacques comes back from vacation? It doesn't make sense > arguing about it when the main proponent of it is not > here. This thread doesn't make sense regardless of who is on vacation. Those of us opposed to this change have shown enough opposition that there will not be a consisenses on this issue. (at least not this go around) This thread should just die period.