From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 22:54:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F6C106566C; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7562614DA3F; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <503FEF19.2020505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:17 -1000 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Abthorpe References: <503A8EF7.4060105@FreeBSD.org> <20120830195632.GQ14617@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120830195632.GQ14617@hub.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can we please just remove the old Makefile headers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:54:27 -0000 On 08/30/2012 09:56 AM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > So without further ado, this is what we would like to see at the top of > the makefile > > # > # $FreeBSD$ > # > > PORTNAME= > > It is as easy as that :) I was sort of afraid that would be the answer ... while I realize we have massive historical precedents for the additional #s above and below the content, what I was hoping for was that we would make the big break with hysterical raisins and just make the # $FreeBSD$ the first line of the file. It's a minor issue (and yes, this is a legitimate bikeshed) but to my way of thinking the extra #s are just wasted space that reduce the amount of useful data that is presented when you open the file in an editor. I won't lose sleep if we go with the extra #s, but I wanted to at least raise the issue in case there was still a chance to keep it simple. :) Doug