From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 28 18:02:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA19175 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 18:02:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from TomQNX.tomqnx.com ([206.75.140.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA19163; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 18:02:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@tomqnx.com) Received: by TomQNX.tomqnx.com (Smail3.2 #1) id m0xxjIr-00085JC; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 21:02:05 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: From: tom@tomqnx.com (Tom Torrance at home) Subject: bad port - mail/imap-uw To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 21:02:05 -0500 (EST) Cc: asami@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31H (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk It appears that this port is bad. Working from the 2.2.5 ports distribution, updated via cvsup today: 1) md5 checksum fails. 2) if checksum is ignored, patch fails. 3) The archive file for the port is quite different in length from the archive file of the same name retrieved via lynx from the master site. 4) Replacing archive files: md5 checksum fails again if checksum ignored, 2 patches fail. Can anyone advise me how to get this port correctly? Regards, Tom