From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 17:03:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603A6106564A for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286CA8FC14 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcwo16 with SMTP id wo16so4247326obc.13 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:03:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/IQybgaPlZX1438KOZuXJ6gg67V2bIghtQs0rIRlVuY=; b=R1amfKFLtfwGdmrKBvkTkLiYz4u4VU4dlFZxO2EBZVAHzlyoY99tm7eGLRlvF0ATGE GRE3emv2Q9Vne3VOMrvnhNc9kiuswmLZzM8Y3e02NtUnxmUI3Y/6SRjF/8vw8uQcOFZT /ImaU5aiwqz32yF3K1EXT+Zf2FoPSVxr5Y2+Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.44.10 with SMTP id a10mr1394154obm.43.1329411824344; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.187.4 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:03:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:03:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: Vick Khera To: emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlk9a4Yiwg/Gbuu2yUGOtXTSuF9nziV9JSJ+qbtdKkOvlOYvg8IOcdRRM1BfSJ33boGxkZu Cc: Subject: Re: message systems Momentum in linuxalator X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:03:45 -0000 On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > I've personally never heard of it before, and looking at the product on > their website isn't very helpful. It's clear that it's an MTA, but I can't > for the life of me figure out what's so special about it. They keep > emphasizing "policies" and "routing" which is pretty basic stuff. I'd find > it hard to believe it's more flexible than Exim, but if there is a reason > why someone would use it instead of an open source MTA I cannot figure that > out. It is for high-volume, high-speed, delivery of email messages, and also has many traffic shaping and routing capabilities that none of the open source MTAs have. I'll see if they let me try it out first.