Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:19:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Culver <culverk@yumyumyum.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2 ports broken after gcc import Message-ID: <20030830121630.F28935@alpha.yumyumyum.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030830104151.47993K-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030830104151.47993K-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I just built a fresh nmap on my -current box and it appears to work fine > for me, as did the older nmap. So I guess that leaves me firmly in the > "unable to reproduce" camp. I have noticed that, on my wi0 boxes, I > tend to get a fair number of ENOBUFS errors when nmaping, but that > appears to be unrelated to the presence of UFS_ACL in the kernel. > > Are your different boxes using the same type of network interface? Do > you rely on routed or use static routes? If you tcpdump the interface, > do any nmap packets get out -- for example, the initial ping it performs > before scanning a host, or none? Well, on one of my boxes, I have IPFILTER, but no ACL's and it works fine, on the one that was previously not working, I had IPFILTER (but with no rules set) and ACL's. I removed all references to ipfilter from rc.conf (my ipf.rules and ipnat.rules were blank), removed IPFILTER and ACL from the kernel, recompiled, and rebooted, and it started working. So now I just have to go back and figure out which knob I turned to fix things. I'm running late now though so I'll let you know as soon as I can get back to it (the computer that was really having the problems was at work, so I can't get to it until tuesday). Ken
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030830121630.F28935>