Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:57:20 +0000 From: "Florent Thoumie" <flz@xbsd.org> To: pav@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: -x11@ maintainship? Message-ID: <a01628140801300157o71abc0f4n568701d543b19de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1201684987.69890.27.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <47A02444.7060706@delphij.net> <1201684987.69890.27.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2008/1/30 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>: > Xin LI píše v út 29. 01. 2008 v 23:16 -0800: > > > I'd like to know about our current policy on -x11@ maintained ports. > > E.g. is it enforced like other MAINTAINERS= lines? N.B. I have a patch > > for xf86-video-nv at > > http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/for_review/xf86-video-nv.diff , where > > should I seek for approval? > > I think flz expressed several times in the past clearly that he's not an > X11 overlord and anyone is welcome to help with the ports. As a matter of fact I'm not, but I'm happy to discuss/review/approve patches. Sending patches for review/testing on x11@ is fine with me, but creating a PR is a better choice when changes are non-trivial. -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a01628140801300157o71abc0f4n568701d543b19de>