From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 14:03:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: standards@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1439010656BA for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FD48FC0C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1EDwscM009397 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:58:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n1EDwsfS009396 for standards@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:58:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:58:54 -0500 From: David Schultz To: standards@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20090214135854.GA9338@zim.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: standards@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Citrus iconv? X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:03:10 -0000 Does anyone know why we don't have the Citrus Project's iconv implementation in libc like NetBSD does, rather than forcing apps that need it to link against GNU libiconv?