From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 17 19:02:47 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8663138E;
 Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:02:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17710C59;
 Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:02:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l2so21286897wgh.27
 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:02:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=AbCYKYkXTo+f6bZiOjaOMC9tWszOLoHRX3FgDzd6zsE=;
 b=ox6i7/vmg7liP7hrvkOwahWYdQpJfiDkr7ZywZiceGUKy7lv4UPd/xvo2jlQe6+kzY
 HD0bxZZsnLqsVvXcVmohigCRSIG2q9NhCA+aZWxtczVwmFzvqgAL6MrLeonWGrSpelip
 V4lbBANvgPpPAuW6m3aj1pgaBFj5guRB6qnQ+SVI/7ffmB7BBUKB53wxIK36gOD5Lvn5
 devazerquiledWis1du0x1fr2+VkSqJ5Tfa0It8QxbK0sCnDirDaeAFovs4W58I0Cg/x
 JdZbgUswYA10B+6CjbD2wX8xVS7y92Lfh02dT1Pzry+Tc5W8QOrKI631UAEe+D4x5vqN
 S48Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.108.9 with SMTP id hg9mr36755240wjb.68.1418842965454;
 Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:02:45 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.106.195 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:02:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <70073.1418837301@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <201412161348.41219.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <20141216233844.GA1490@stack.nl>
 <2034186.iLaW9EGnEt@ralph.baldwin.cx>
 <70073.1418837301@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:02:45 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: PBktTGHdnB8V4eg3266N2a_hoe0
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmokkc-p4-keMExxT+wyjugA8zYRS2XRv6VucWnfH0iw_Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Change default VFS timestamp precision?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>,
 Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 19:02:47 -0000

On 17 December 2014 at 09:28, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> --------
> In message <2034186.iLaW9EGnEt@ralph.baldwin.cx>, John Baldwin writes:
>
>>My bad for not checking that further but for assuming make would be impacted.
>
> I think it is over 10 years ago when make(1) first started seeing
> identical timestamps which wasn't.
>
> In most Makefiles this doesn't matter, but there are cases, in particular
> in less integrated families of makefiles than our own.

Surely there has to be better ways of doing this stuff. Computers keep
getting faster; it wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility that we
could see a compiler read, compile and spit out a .o inside of a
millisecond. (Obviously not C++, but..)


-adrian