From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 30 12:43:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC1A37B401 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 12:43:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07200; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:43:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA09484; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:43:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15166.11233.223309.96395@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:43:29 -0600 (MDT) To: Bsdguru@aol.com Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of encryption hardware support in FreeBSD In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > > Really? Have you even looked at the net4501 board which was mentioned? > > > > It's > > > > a single-board computer constructed for some specific communication > > > > applications, with no VGA or keyboard support, or spinning fans, and > is > > > > pretty inexpensive and in a very small form factor. Why do I want to > > > > replace this with "a new motherboard?" > > > > > > Because my motherboard is 20 times faster, has VGA support,doesnt > require > > an > > > add-on board to do fast encryption and costs about the same as yours. > > Thats > > > why. > > > > Again, you are only considering your personal case. If crypto should > > be needed on an embedded appliance, I don't think they would need > > a lightning-fast processor and VGA support, when crypto is all > > they want. > > > > Your premise that "embedded appliances" are somehow doomed to use pitifully > outdated processors is simply wrong. Who said anything about pitifully outdated processors. I can buy a heck of alot of CPU horsepower w/out buying the latest/greatest CPU. As a matter of fact, in almost all cases, the best bang for the buck would be for processorts that you imply to 'pitfully outdated'. > Embedded MBs with speeds enough to eliminate the requirement for 1) a > slot and 2) an external board are available for less than the delta in > cost. That's simply not true. If you are building 'truly embedded' systems (ie; 100K+ boxes), you're not going to be using 'off the shelf' PC parts. You're going to be specifying particular parts to be used, and in general the difference in cost of $1-5 for the CPU makes a *huge* difference in the price-point you are trying to make. Often times it's easier to build a hierarchy of products, with each individual tier having the same 'basic' setup (keeping costs low), and by adding additional 'special purpose' boards, you can increase the functionality of the box by only increasing the costs trivially. > So, logically speaking, anyone > with a requirement for crypto would simply chose a faster embedded MB > solution. You seem to have a different definition of embedded than many others do Bryan. Have you ever been involved with specifying and building embedded systems products, or are you just talking out of the side of your mouth? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message