From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sun Jun 18 01:25:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98282C794C0; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 01:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750667E58E; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 01:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B4C3F650; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 21:25:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias.dhcp.nue.suse.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C57C43F4D9; Sat, 17 Jun 2017 21:25:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 03:25:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jan Beich cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r443793 - head/lang/gcc7-devel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201706172327.v5HNRbGE015821@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 01:25:31 -0000 On Sun, 18 Jun 2017, Jan Beich wrote: >> When we set STAGE1_CXXFLAGS / CXXFLAGS in MAKE_FLAGS for arm platforms, >> do so incrementally (with += instead of =). > Did you mean to use MAKE_ENV instead of +=? I'm not sure. ;-) In your example, += did not actually work in the MAKE_ENV tests, did it? Did you mean that the commit message should have referred to MAKE_ARGS instead of MAKE_FLAGS? If so, I agree, that was a "typo" of mine. If there is anything beyond that, I am not seeing it right now, but I simply may be too tired (so a patch might be best). Thanks, Gerald