From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Apr 18 04:46:00 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA01283
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:46:00 -0700
Received: from mail.Germany.EU.net (mail.Germany.EU.net [192.76.144.65])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA01275
          for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:45:30 -0700
From: Bernard.Steiner@Germany.EU.net
Received: by mail.Germany.EU.net with ESMTP (8.6.5:29/EUnetD-2.5.1.d) via EUnet
	id NAA01395; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:47:10 +0200
Message-Id: <199504181147.NAA03973@qwerty.Germany.EU.net>
Received: from localhost.Germany.EU.net
	by qwerty.Germany.EU.net with SMTP (8.6.4/EUnetDlan-1.14-1.2.0)
	via EUnet for [mail.germany.eu.net]
	id NAA03973; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:47:09 +0200
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: couple of bugs in 2.0R 
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:02 PDT.
             <199504181139.EAA00249@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 13:46:42 +0200
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[ed0 watchdog timer]

        What about other values? ...such as 3? Also, should I assume that your 
    ed0 is on irq 11? 

Dunno. That was just my first guess, as in "increase by either 0x10 or 10".
I'll try other ones, just to make sure.

Yes, ed0 sits on irq11 port 0x300 iomem 0xcc000 iosize 16364.
Has been sitting there for quite some time rather happily with 1.1.5.1 without
any problems (I didn't fiddle watchdogs there).

Bernard