From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 02:38:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2E716A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:38:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AECE43D48 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:38:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B097351A01; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:38:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:38:36 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050214023836.GA27431@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200501271852.j0RIqQ9t010411@mp.cs.niu.edu> <44is5imspz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <04d201c51214$4bb07ab0$7702a8c0@officeeagle> <420FD249.4060408@mac.com> <2147483647.1108326906@[192.168.2.100]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1108326906@[192.168.2.100]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated perl - broke stuff X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:38:37 -0000 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:35:06PM -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Sunday, February 13, 2005 5:18 PM -0500 Chuck Swiger =20 > wrote: > > > >Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING? It contains a suggestion for how to > >update the Perl ports which might have helped... > > > Well, no. Why on earth would I do *that*? ;-) >=20 > (Thanks for the tip. I ran it.) I wonder why the perl port doesn't=20 > include this command in a post-install script? It's a once-off change needed when updating from an older version, and the post-install script (or any other part of the port build) doesn't know that this is what is happening. kris --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCEA8sWry0BWjoQKURAtYSAKDoythughi14Nayf57BecPMFTE7OgCfUGb1 dRvdBzZYLj2uVLnmu/gZhvs= =gUlm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy--